Legal Opinion

Greensboro & New Castle Junction Turnpike Co. v. Stratton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1889No. 13,788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This is an action to' recover for the value of work and labor done and performed by the appellee on the turnpike owned by the appellant at appellant’s request, and for gravel and materials furnished by appellee to appellant, and used in the construction and repair of the road-bed and bridges of said turnpike.

There is no question as to the pleadings presented by the record. It is stated by counsel for appellant in his brief that a demurrer was sustained to the1 fourth paragraph of answer, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer, but the . demurrer is not in the record.

The case, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cheeney v. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. Rogers v. Hastings & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Shackelford v. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Henry v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Wagner v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Bell v. Peper Tobacco Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API