Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United Transportation Union, Also Known as C & T, Also Known as Utu Kent H. Madison
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentMeMILLIAN, Circuit Judge
For the reasons discussed below, I cannot agree with the majority opinion’s holding that federal courts can vacate arbitration awards under the Railway Labor Act on public policy grounds. Accordingly, I would reverse the decision of the district court and enforce the decision of the Board reinstating the employee, subject to the usual back-to-work examination, and awarding him back pay less 90 days for mishandling the switch.
Whether there is a public policy exception under the Railway Labor Act is a difficult question. On the one hand, as noted by the majority opinion, the scope of judicial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.