Commonwealth v. Amaral
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMilkey, J.
For the attempted robbery of a pharmacy, a Superior Court jury convicted the defendant of armed assault with intent to rob, G. L. c. 265, § 18(6). The issue at trial was identification. On appeal, the defendant raises a variety of arguments regarding both the showup procedure that police used, and a photographic array that police assembled but did not use. We affirm.
*1441. Background.1 a. The crime. On the evening of March 16, 2009, a man stood in line at a Walgreens store in Fall River. He was wearing a dark-colored coat that had a light-colored hood and sleeves. When the man got to the front of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BowdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. O'DELLMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. St. GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MeasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- COMMONWEALTH v. ANTHONY TRAVIS.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Commonwealth v. BethuneMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017