Legal Opinion

Strong v. Eldorado Casino Shreveport Joint Venture

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 2011No. 46,464-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

hAt issue in this appeal is whether markers representing credit extended by the defendants, Eldorado Casino Shreveport Joint Venture, Eldorado Shreveport No. 1, and Eldorado Shreveport No. 2 (referred to collectively as “Eldorado”), to the plaintiff, Janis Strong (“Strong”), are enforceable. By summary judgment, the trial court concluded that the markers are enforceable and ordered Strong to pay the amount due plus damages, attorney fees, and costs as provided by La. R.S. 9:2782, totaling $190,600. Strong now appeals. Finding that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Skannal v. BamburgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Skannall v. Bamburg, 2010-0707 (La. 5/28/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. Carnival Leisure Industries, Ltd. v. AubinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Sims v. Sun Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nola 180 v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Harvey v. Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014
  4. Mickey McGuinness Quinlan, Mackey Sugar Quinlan, and Charles Brian Sugar v. Melissa Sugar-GoldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API