Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 10, 2010No. 102,527Published

1DissentLeben, J.

Most of the time, the words we choose have some imprecision in conveying our intended meaning (assuming we’ve thought enough about the matter to have a clear intended meaning).

An oft-used example in law schools is a statute forbidding vehicles in a park. Certainly cars can’t be driven there, but what about a golf cart? Or a Segway? It depends upon what vehicle means.

This sort of imprecision is especially important when we give juries the instructions they must follow. The instructions must be sufficiently precise that they accurately tell the jurors the key concepts that must guide their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ColstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. People v. HoehlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API