Anderson v. State

LAWRENCE, Judge.

In this belated appeal, Aaron Reynold Anderson (Anderson) argues there are two defects in his written judgment and sentence which must be corrected. The State properly concedes error on both. First, the judgment erroneously indicates Anderson was convicted of purchasing cocaine within 200 feet of a public housing facility, a crime with which he was never charged and a crime to which he never pleaded. Anderson was convicted of purchasing cocaine.1 Second, the written sentence assessed $100 in costs to go to the Florida Crime Lab Trust Fund. This cost is discretionary and as…