Co-Operating Merchants' Co. v. Hallock
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal' from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order allowing an injunction pendente lite to restrain infringement of letters patent No. 600,782, issued to Daniel Youngs Hallock and Daniel Earnest Hallock for an improvement in weeding machines. It is now insisted that we shall set aside the injunction and dismiss the bill upon the contention that the prior art, as shown by certain prior patents, discloses an anticipation of the first and second claims of the patent, which are the only claims involved. In addition to a defense of the novelty of the claims of the patent, the appellees contend…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Ward Baking Co. v. Weber Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916