Legal Opinion

State v. Moreno

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 1976No. 1 CA-CR 1082PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

After a trial by jury, appellant was convicted of possession of heroin for sale and placed on probation for five years. Pursuant to a warrant, obtained through information supplied by a confidential informant, the police searched appellant’s apartment and found 10.5 grams of heroin. Appellant’s defense to the charge was that this amount of heroin did not create a presumption of possession for sale and that the heroin did not belong to him, but rather to his roommate.

On appeal appellant raises 10 issues:

1. whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. ShingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. KillianCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. State v. ViertelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. State v. SecordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API