Legal Opinion
Cox v. Stolworthy
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1972No. 10906Published
1Opinion of the Court
496 P.2d 682 (1972)
94 Idaho 683
Clinton COX and Roger D. Cox, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Lloyd STOLWORTHY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10906.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
April 27, 1972.
Arthur L. Smith of Albaugh, Bloem, Smith & Pike, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant.
Willis B. Benjamin, of St. Clair, St. Clair, Hiller & Benjamin, Idaho Falls, for plaintiffs-respondents.
McFADDEN, Justice.
Plaintiffs-respondents Clinton Cox and Roger D. Cox, father and son, instituted this action against defendant-appellant Lloyd Stolworthy, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for trespass upon premises held by the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.