Legal Opinion

In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 29, 2023No. 0:20-cv-00827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation Case No. 20-CV-827 (ECT/JFD) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ORDER All Actions This case is before the Court on the Motion (Dkt. No. 564) of Defendants Express Scripts and OptumRx to Compel Plaintiffs to Answer Interrogatories. The case has been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

and District of Minnesota Local Rule 72.1. The Court held a motion hearing on November 21, 2022, where Peter Kohn argued for Plaintiffs and Samuel Johnson argued for the moving…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.