Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Van Gilder v. Warfield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1941No. 6882Published

1Concurrence

GIVENS, J.,

concurring specially — It seems to me that, going directly to the heart of the controversy involved herein, the ultimate, decisive question is whether the amounts paid out by the administrator and the credits allowed respondent were for expenses of the last illness of the deceased and for the necessary preservation of the estate, and therefore fall within section 15-1127 I. C. A. as not requiring the filing of claims therefor, as construed in Hubbard v. Ball, 59 Ida. 78, 81 Pac. (2d) 73.

Though the amount was not as large and the period of time over which the expenses had been…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McHan v. McHanIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re SpeerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. In re Estate of WeringerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Long v. NorthupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Walling v. BownIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API