Legal Opinion

United States v. Giddens

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1974No. 73-3980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The original indictment charging Mr. Giddens with income tax evasion alleged venue in Chamblee, Georgia. The government admitted it could not prove venue in Chamblee and returned a superseding indictment against both Mr. and Mrs. Giddens alleging venue in the Middle District of Florida.

Relying on a series of cases which stand for the principle that the law of double jeopardy precludes retrial when the district court has ruled in favor of the defendant on facts going to the merits of the case if these facts were adduced at an evidentiary hearing, e. g., United States v. Lewis, 492 F.2d 126…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Stephen FindleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Jose Emiliano VelazquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Harvey K. Giddens and Amanda B. Giddens, No. 73-3980 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API