Legal Opinion

Peyton Creek Irr. Dist. v. White

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1921No. 7988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; M. S. Munson, Judge. Suit by John W. White against the Peyton Creek Irrigation District, which answered, with a cross-action against Sutherland and another, sureties on plaintiff’s contractor’s bond. Decree for the plaintiff and that defendant take nothing by its cross-action, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

White sued the Peyton Creek Irrigation District of Matagorda county, Tex., a body corporate existing under and by virtue of title 73, chapter 2, of our Revised Statutes, to recover the sums of $1,824.50 and $1,040.80, respectively, for certain work alleged to have been done by him for it on Lake Austin Dam in Matagorda county, claiming the first amount as the balance unpaid under a written contract between them calling for a total of $6,960, and the second *1062for extras pursuant to a yerbal agreement. He averred completion of tbe work, its acceptance by tbe district, and compliance on bis part…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burges v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  2. Strickland v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  3. Jones v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. Burges v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  5. Jones v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API