Legal Opinion

Rohter v. Passarella

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1993No. 1-91-4052, 1-92-0107PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiff William Rohter appeals from the trial court’s grant of a motion for a “directed” finding brought by defendants Gilbert and Patricia Passarella, Dorothy Passarella, 707 Devon Corp., and Park Ridge Travel Bureau, Inc. (the travel bureau). Defendants cross-appeal from the court’s earlier denial of their section 2 — 619 motion (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2 — 619) which had sought a determination that portions of plaintiff’s claims were barred due to the expiration of the limitations period.

On December 7, 1990, plaintiff filed four separate but identical complaints alleging that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kokinis v. KotrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Evanston v. Ridgeview House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ekl v. KnechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  3. Bernstein & Grazian, P.C. v. Grazian & Volpe, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Draper v. Frontier InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API