Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 17, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the' Chancery Court of the city of Richmond. Decree for the complainant. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This suit in chancery ivas instituted by the city of Richmond against the children and heirs at law of James Murphy, deceased, for the purpose of collecting cert a ip taxes due the city, assessed against James Murphy in his life time and some years after his death, upon certain real estate owned by him situated in the city of Richmond.

The “agreed facts” out of which this appeal arises are as follows: That James Murphy was the owner of the real estate involved in these proceedings; that Murphy became indebted to various people, and certain judgments were obtained against him; that in order to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linkenhoker's Heirs v. DetrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  2. Mahaffy v. MahaffySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Lindsay v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Tabb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. White v. OwenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oliver Reginald Cheeseman and Isabelle Cheeseman v. Erwin B. Nachman, in Re Oliver Reginald Cheeseman and Isabelle Cheeseman, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  2. Bass v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
  3. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  4. Goad v. Patrick Henry National Bank (In Re Goad)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1993
  5. Roberts v. County of Henrico Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API