Legal Opinion

Caughman v. Glaze

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1967No. 14522PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Carl Clifton Caughman and wife, Bobbie Ruth Caughman, appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, denying them recovery against defendant, Olvis Vanburn Glaze, for injuries suffered by them when their car was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by defendant. The judgment also denied defendant recovery on his cross-action, but he has not appealed from such ruling.

The jury found that defendant was guilty of the following acts or omissions, each of which was found to be a proximate cause of the collision: (1) Failure to properly overtake and pass plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sisti v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Ex parte BenfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Barnes v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API