Caughman v. Glaze
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CADENA, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Carl Clifton Caughman and wife, Bobbie Ruth Caughman, appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, denying them recovery against defendant, Olvis Vanburn Glaze, for injuries suffered by them when their car was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by defendant. The judgment also denied defendant recovery on his cross-action, but he has not appealed from such ruling.
The jury found that defendant was guilty of the following acts or omissions, each of which was found to be a proximate cause of the collision: (1) Failure to properly overtake and pass plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Texas Employers' Insurance v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Sisti v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ex parte BenfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Barnes v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.