United States v. Cano Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
The record sent up to the Supreme Court states that this action is a bill in equity, brought by the State's attorney of Washington County, in the name of the United States of America, pursuant to Title 2 of the Act of Congress, dated October 28, 1919, known as the "National Prohibition Act," against Manuel Cano and his wife, Julia Cano, both of the city of Barre; that the case was heard before the chancellor (named) upon the bill, answer, and demurrer which was incorporated in the answer; that to the overruling of demurrer, and the entering of a decree according to the bill, defendants…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Island Pond National Bank v. LacroixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Residents of Royalton v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Fire District No. 1 v. Graniteville Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Duprey v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- City of Newport v. LinsdsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1933