Legal Opinion

United States v. Cano Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record sent up to the Supreme Court states that this action is a bill in equity, brought by the State's attorney of Washington County, in the name of the United States of America, pursuant to Title 2 of the Act of Congress, dated October 28, 1919, known as the "National Prohibition Act," against Manuel Cano and his wife, Julia Cano, both of the city of Barre; that the case was heard before the chancellor (named) upon the bill, answer, and demurrer which was incorporated in the answer; that to the overruling of demurrer, and the entering of a decree according to the bill, defendants…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Island Pond National Bank v. LacroixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Residents of Royalton v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Fire District No. 1 v. Graniteville Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Duprey v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  5. City of Newport v. LinsdsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API