Legal Opinion

Parker v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 5, 1948No. 270PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner, who was engaged in litigation in the Illinois courts with one Shamberg, was ordered on a motion for discovery to produce certain documents. He produced them by filing them with the clerk of the Illinois courts. Shamberg thereupon moved that petitioner be punished for contempt because the documents reflected on the integrity of the court. After a hearing petitioner was adjudged guilty of contempt. The court held that the order required only that petitioner produce the documents, not that he file them in court so as to make them public records; and that the filing of the documents…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Great Western Telegraph Co. v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Groome v. Freyn Engineering Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Davis v. O'HARASupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Central Union Telephone Co. v. City of EdwardsvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Paterno v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API