Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zdrale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1990No. 1123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Nikolai Zdrale, was convicted by a jury of criminal solicitation and conspiracy. Post-trial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to five (5) to ten (10) years imprisonment. This direct appeal followed. We affirm.

On appeal, appellant claims that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence hearsay statements of an alleged co-conspirator, by consolidating the trial and by admitting statements made by the co-defendant.

The charges arose from a conspiracy which included multiple actors. The central figure in the conspiracy was William Fiore. Mr. Fiore was a landfill…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrakovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. FioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. ZdraleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. ZaslowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API