Andrews v. Harvey
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Victoria. Tried below before the Hon. T. C. Barden. The material facts in this case sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The verdict of the jury in this case is to-the following effect: They found that all the allegations-in the plaintiff’s petition were not true ; whether any of them were true or not the verdict does not say; but the-jury find that H. H. McGrew is indebted to the plaintiff, Harvey, $333 for the rent of 1869, and they also find thatMcGfrew and Andrews are both indebted to Harvey in a. like sum, with interest from February 6, 1871.
To understand this verdict, and the judgment which, follows it, we must- look to the facts, the pleadings, and. the charge of the court. Both parties appear…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Funk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Harvey v. McGrewTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Fields, Garnishee, and Scott v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Norton v. MacateeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Bank of Erin v. Houston CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.