Taylor v. Klein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
By descent from their father, Oscar and Gilbert Hatfield took title to' an equal undivided interest in certain real property, a part of which is the subject of this submission. Subsequently Oscar was-adjudged to be a lunatic, and the plaintiff was duly appointed and qualified as a committee of his person and estate, and discharged the duties of such relation. Gilbert transferred title to his undivided share In the property, and!, after the appointment of the plaintiff as-committee, Gilbert’s grantee brought an action for the partition of the premises. This action proceeded to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Van Epps v. Van EppsNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- McPherson v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seymour v. SeymourNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Gardner v. DembinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Miller v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Greenslete v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Multz v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.