Legal Opinion

Kevorkian v. Arnett

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 11, 1996No. CV-94-6089 CBM (Kx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by each remaining party to this action: Plaintiff Jack Kevorkian, M.D.; Plaintiff John Doe; and Defendant Daniel E. Lungren. The Court, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge, presiding, has considered the motion papers, counsel arguments, and the evidence, and based thereupon, issues the following order:

THE REMAINING PARTIES

1. Plaintiff John Doe

John Doe is 85 years old and was first diagnosed as HIV positive in July, 1984. He was diagnosed as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krischer v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API