Legal Opinion

Leleux v. Serafino

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1935No. 2845Published

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee in the county court at law of Jefferson county to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $350, bearing 8 per cent, interest, and providing that if collected by legal proceedings 10 per cent, additional should be paid as collection fees. The note was payable to appellant on demand. At the time of the execution of the note, appel-lee executed a pledge agreement and mortgage on a certain diamond ring to secure the payment of the note. The pledged ring was delivered to appellant, which ever since has remained and now is in the possession of appellant.

Ap…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skud v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  2. King v. Boerne State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Otis v. MedoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Farmers' National Bank of Ponca City v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Slyman v. SimonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API