Legal Opinion
In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the application, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and set aside the Referee’s sale of property owned by petitioners John P. Jensen and Michael P. Barnett and encumbered by a mortgage held by petitioner Jennie Lucci. Petitioners concede that respondent County of Erie (County) complied with the Erie County Tax Act (ECTA) notice provisions (ECTA §§ 11-13.0, 11-14.0), but contend that they were denied their constitutional right to due process. We disagree.
“[P]rior to an action which will affect an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. County of SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Harville v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kennedy v. MossafaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Citibank v. TebsheranyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Foreclosure of Tax LiensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000