Legal Opinion

Kallstrom v. Kallstrom

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff commenced this suit to obtain reformation of a trust instrument which formed a portion of the property settlement agreement in plaintiff’s divorce from defendant Harriet M. Kallstrom. Plaintiff sought payment of certain pre-divorce tax deficiencies from the trust corpus, alleging that a provision for payment of these deficiencies had not been included in the trust due to the mutual mistake of the Kallstroms, the co-settlors of the trust. The trial court found that plaintiff alone was responsible for the tax deficiencies and denied the relief requested. Plaintiff appeals.

It appears…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barone v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Martin v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Norman v. Jerich CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Segal v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Montgomery v. Wadsworth Plumbing & Heating Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Helm v. HelmSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API