Jones v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
The appellant entered a plea of guilty before a jury to the offense of rape. His punishment was assessed at life.
Three grounds of error are alleged on appeal, the first being a contention that a proper and adequate admonishment was not given. Such contention is overruled. The record shows that appellant was fully, adequately and properly admonished pursuant to Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. The admonishment covers approximately two and a half pages of the record and shows that the appellant fully understood the consequences of his plea and that it was voluntarily given.
N…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montalvo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Varela v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Bartholomew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Moon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.