Legal Opinion

Beall v. Graham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Dunklin Circuit Court. — Hon. James L. Fort, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

This action originated in the probate court on a demand preferred by Beall & Beall, a firm of physicians, against S. H. Graham, guardian and curator of Gladys and Chalmer Copeland, the minor children of George Copeland, Jr., deceased. The demand was presented in the probate court in the following form:

*39“I)rs. Beall & Beall, Respondents, v. S. H. Graham, Guardian and Curator of Gladys and Chalmer Copeland, Minors, Appellant. No. 10457.
“Petition on Statement.
“Malden, Mo., Feby. 23, 1905.
“Mr. George Copeland, Jr., Deck!

To Drs. Beall & Beall, Dr.

Medical attendance in last illness.

1903

June 19 to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Childs v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Lilly v. MenkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. South St. Joseph Land Co. v. BretzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Pemiscot County v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Knights of PythiasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Ver Standig v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Gibbs v. Knights of PythiasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ordelheide v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API