Legal Opinion

Knighton v. Desportes Merc. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 18, 1922No. 10870PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Acting Associate Justice I. H. Hunt.

The facts are set out in the “case” as follows:

“This action was commenced .by the service of a summons and complaint on the defendant on the 9th day of March, 1918. The action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, a mercantile corporation, to recover the sum of $612.94, being double the amount of usurious interest alleged to have been collected and received by the defendant from the plaintiff on two certain notes given by the plaintiff to the defendant, to wit: Upon one note for $274, dated the 7th day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shephard v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  2. Gill v. RugglesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Rountree v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  4. Whitman v. CorleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Scott v. WigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Mexican Crude Rubber Co. v. AckleySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Fulton R. Gordon, Inc. v. SchramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Beckham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API