Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. Canales
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOGGETT, Justice.
We consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to permit the late filing of objections to a discovery request. Concluding that the unusual facts before us establish that a dilatory response should have been permitted, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
In the underlying class action addressing the safety of the Model 700 rifle, its manufacturer, Remington Arms Company, failed to reply within thirty days to a request for production. Through a motion to compel, the plaintiffs sought to obtain the requested materials, asserting that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- United States Government v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Feldman v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. Luna, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Global Services, Inc. v. BianchiTexas Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.