Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Manhattan Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Patrick A. Cronin, an infant, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered m the office of the clerk of the county of Suffolk on the 26th day of November, 1907, granting the defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from the county of Suffolk to the county of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

¡Rich, J.:

The motion was made to change the place of trial from the county of.Suffolk to the county of ¡New Yorlt for the’ convenience' of witnesses. Upon the hearing it appeared that the- place of trial designated in, the-complaint is not the proper county, and the learned trial justice presiding at the Special Term made an order' changing the place of trial. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the order was improperly granted and cites Phillips v. Tietjen (108 App. Div. 9) to support his contention. In that " case- no demand was served; in fact no motion Was" made to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. TietjenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. McConihe v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldfeder v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Du Pont v. Bank of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Block v. Bacon Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Reliable Displays Corp. v. Maro Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Johnson v. PapenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API