State v. Kramer

¶ 1. Carl R. Kramer appeals from a judgment of conviction for two violations of the criminal commercial gambling statute, WlS. STAT. § 945.03(5) (1995-96), 1 and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal of the felony charges. Kramer contends that he lacked the requisite intent to commit the crimes, that the applicable criminal statutes are unconstitutionally vague, that the anticipatory search warrant executed at his establishment on December 5, 1996, was defective and required suppression of the evidence, and that he was the victim of selective prosecution. We agree that…