Legal Opinion

Industrial Life & Health Insurance v. Warren

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1931No. 21726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the petition did not set out a new cause of action and was not subject to any other ground of the objections urged against it. See, in this connection, Quillian v. Johnson, 122 Ga. 49 (4), 55 (49 S. E. 801) ; Orr Stationery Co. v. Dr. Bell &c. Co., 4 Ga. App. 702 (62 S. E. 471); Ellison v. Georgia Railroad Co., 87 Ga. 691 (2) (13 S. E. 809). Furthermore, all the objections urged against the amendment were of the nature of special demurrers and should *358have been set forth in writing. The record fails to show that they were so set forth. Calhoun v. Mosley, 114 Ga. 641 (2) (40…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Quillian v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Crockett & Co. v. Garrard & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Calhoun v. MosleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Martin v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Bower v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API