Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Carlson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1988No. 15450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This case is before us on rehearing. For a recitation of the facts see our former holding at 411 N.W.2d 415 (S.D.1987). After granting rehearing we received additional briefs and heard oral argument. Based on all the authority previously cited, we continue to be persuaded that the trial court erred in the entry of its summary judgment of foreclosure and we therefore renew our reversal.

As we previously noted, SDCL 21-47-15 and -16 are clear. Those statutes, read together, place a burden upon a mortgagee seeking a deficiency judgment to establish by competent proof the fair and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perpetual National Life Insurance Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Todd v. WinkelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. CarlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlson v. First National Bank, HettingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. M.B. v. KonenkampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. CarlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. M.B. v. KonenkampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. v. MarxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API