Patrick Pierce v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals the district court’s grant of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas corpus relief to Patrick Pierce on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing resulting in an incorrectly calculated Guidelines range. We reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2009, Pierce was charged with and pled guilty to being a felon in possession of ammunition, based upon an incident wherein Pierce fired shots in public, and continued to fire shots while leading police on a high speed chase through metro St. Louis. During the chase, Pierce threw the gun out of the car and it was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LazarskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Stacy Lee PeltierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Tinajero-Ortiz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raphael Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Roberto Barajas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Raphael Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Raphael Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014