Legal Opinion

CHANG v. ABLE C&C CO. LTD.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 17, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02590Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SEHOON CHANG, Civil Action No. Plaintiff, 23-cv-02590 (KSH) (JRA) v. ABLE C&C CO. LTD., OPINION Defendant. José R. Almonte, U.S.M.J. Defendant Able C&C Co. Ltd. (“Defendant” or “Able South Korea”) moves to disqualify Peter Y. Lee, Esq. (“Mr. Lee”), counsel for Plaintiff Sehoon Chang (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Chang”) (the “Motion”). ECF Nos. 82, 84. Plaintiff opposes the Motion. ECF No. 83. Disqualifying an attorney from a case is a drastic measure, one that has adverse pecuniary ramifications for the client and potential cataclysmic impact on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  5. Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Crossland Savings, FSBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API