Chapman Lumber Co. v. Benfield
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Is plaintiffs’ claim, in its present form, of such nature as to create a lien upon the specific fund in the hands of the clerk ? The court below answered in favor of the plaintiff. As to the correctness of this ruling this Court (Schenck, J., not sitting) is evenly divided in opinion. Hence, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accord with the usual practice in such eases, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N. C., 799, 4 S. E. (2d), 449; Pafford v. Construction Co., 218 N. C., 782, 11 S. E. (2d), 548.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Fibre Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940