Legal Opinion
Davidson Rehab Associates v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Davidson Rehab Associates)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1989No. 18-37060PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HOWARD C. BUSCHMAN III, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, Davidson Rehab Associates (“Davidson”, “Plaintiff”, or “Debtor”), filed an Amended Complaint against Defendants United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and D.W. Associates (“DWA”), and Jerome Belson Associates to avoid a non-judicial foreclosure sale of certain building properties. In its Amended Complaint, Davidson sets forth five causes of action under which it alleges that it may avoid the foreclosure sale. Here, Davidson moves, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7056, for summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Andy Associates, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gillman v. Preston Family Investment Co. (In Re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Varon v. Trimble, Marshall & Goldman, P.C. (In Re Euro-Swiss International Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- In Re ButchmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Michigan Lithographing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Cerrato v. BAC Home Loans Servicing (In re Cerrato)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In Re Marie Pastor's Morningstar Management, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Owen-Ames-Kimball Co. v. Michigan Lithographing Co. (In Re Michigan Lithographing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
- Owen-Ames-Kimball Co. v. Michigan Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.