Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Lovejoy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1956No. 36049PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions in which it was insisted that the plaintiff had failed to comply with Code § 70-305 as amended. The failure of the plaintiff to comply with the requirements of this Code section would not result in a dismissal of the bill of exceptions, but would only result in a refusal of this court to consider assignments of error requiring a reference to the brief of evidence. See Buice v. State, 92 Ga. App. 260 (88 S. E. 2d 322).

In the present case it appears that there has been a bona fide attempt to comply with this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Reed v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tidwell v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API