San Antonio River Authority v. Austin Bridge & Road, L.P. and Hayward Baker, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 17-0905 ══════════ SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY, PETITIONER, v. AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD, L.P. AND HAYWARD BAKER, INC., RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BOYD, joined by CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GUZMAN, and JUSTICE DEVINE, dissenting. Because I do not agree that the San Antonio River Authority was authorized to resolve its dispute with Austin Bridge & Road through binding arbitration, 1 I…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Sherman v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Stauffer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Williams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.