Legal Opinion

San Antonio River Authority v. Austin Bridge & Road, L.P. and Hayward Baker, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2020No. 17-0905Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 17-0905 ══════════ SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY, PETITIONER, v. AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD, L.P. AND HAYWARD BAKER, INC., RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BOYD, joined by CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GUZMAN, and JUSTICE DEVINE, dissenting. Because I do not agree that the San Antonio River Authority was authorized to resolve its dispute with Austin Bridge & Road through binding arbitration, 1 I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Sherman v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Stauffer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Williams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API