Legal Opinion

Richards v. Newstifter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 1904No. 13,834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Johnson district court; Winfield PL Sheldon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

C. F. Richards brought an action against J. E. Boyd and L. J. Newstifter to recover $102 on a promissory note. It had been given to J. *351P. Sherr, who, some time after maturity, transferred it to Richards. On the back of the note payments had been indorsed, and there was also a statement that “this note is by permission of surety extended twelve months. A. C. S.” In his answer Newstifter alleged that he signed the note as surety only ; that he had never received any of the consideration or benefits of the note, and that after the note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Streeter v. PoorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  2. Jacob Leu & Sons v. Mayer, Sells & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moseman v. L. M. Penwell Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Allison v. BorerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Bryner v. WhitneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Fourth National Bank v. FrostSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API