Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Rose

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHugh S. Coyle, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for an order pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out the answer of the defendants Allan Y. Rose and Willa Rose, and directing summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. The action is one to foreclose a mortgage. The plaintiff is a holder of a certain mortgage and mortgage note executed on November 13,1958. The original mortgagor was the defendant Innis Lake Estates, Inc., a corporation. The mortgage is in the sum of $10,000 and the mortgage note accompanying said mortgage by its terms was payable on November 13, 1959, with interest at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Halsey v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Ferris v. . HardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Metropolitan Savings Bank v. TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. 2846 Briggs Avenue, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Jewelers, Inc. v. Standard Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. Reyes v. Carver Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API