Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railroad v. City of Ludington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1903No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Mason; McAlvay, J. Assumpsit by the Pere Marquette Railroad Company against the city of Ludington to recover taxes paid under protest. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff 'to recover from the defendant a tax claimed to have been *398illegally assessed, and paid involuntarily and under protest. In the year 1899 the city of Ludington assessed the tax against the plaintiff on account of its ownership of a stock of groceries, of the value of about $1,000, situated in its warehouse in said defendant city. This stock of groceries was kept to furnish supplies for the crew and passengers on a line of steamboats owned and operated by plaintiff. These boats ran between said city of Ludington,- one of plaintiff’s termini upon Lake…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox v. WelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IrvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Consumers Power Co. v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. General Discount Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Stroop v. Rutherford CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API