Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Heights R. v. City of Brooklyn.

New York City Court

Decided April 25, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company to restrain the city of .Brooklyn from preventing plaintiff from laying certain railroad tracks. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyok, J.

The plaintiff was duly incorporated, and acquired by purchase and by resolutions of the Brooklyn common council its franchise, under and in pursuance of the provisions of Laws 1884, c. 252, and Law's 1886, c. 642. By the terms of the franchise and resolutions, express consent and authority were given to plaintiff to construct a cable road from Court street through Montague street to Wall street ferry, and also to construct “connections, sid*877ings, switches, turnouts, and turntables * * * necessary for the housing aud care of its cars, ” in locations approved of by the commissioners of city…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. City of Kalamazoo v. Michigan Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Homac Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API