Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1957No. 528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Did the answer raise issues of fact or merely issues of law? If material facts alleged by the petitioner are denied by the defendants, the truth must be ascertained by a jury. G.S. 1-172; Sparks v. Sparks, 232 N.C. 492, 61 S.E. 2d 356; Wells v. Clayton, 236 N.C. 102, 72 S.E. 2d 16.

Petitioner alleges that she is entitled to dower, and, based on her life expectancy, the cash value of her dower is $1,169.35. Defendants expressly deny this asserted value. Upon this denial the burden of proof rests upon petitioner. Some of the factors tending to support her claim are admitted. It is admitted that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. In Re CainUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API