Legal Opinion
Alford v. Ingram
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided March 20, 1996No. Civil Action 95-C-484-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiffs, teachers within the Alabama public school system who hold teaching certificates, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1988. They claim that ALA.CODE § 16-23-5 (1987) is unconstitutionally vague, and thus violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The plaintiffs also seek certification of a class. Both parties have submitted briefs on this issue, and a bench trial was held on September 11, 1995.
II. FACTS
Persons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Winters v. Arizona Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Lehto v. Board of Education of the Caesar Rodney School DistrictSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- J.F. Ingram State Technical College v. CarterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Durstein v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021