Legal Opinion

Bleman v. Gold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1968No. Appeal, 395PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellant, Howard Bleman, instituted a trespass action for property damage to two adjacent buildings owned by him in the City of Philadelphia. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit against appellant and in favor of appellees, Nathan Gold and Shirley Gold. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial judge directed a verdict against appellant and in favor of appellee, City of Philadelphia. The case proceeded to the jury against the appellee, Nate Kaplan, and the jury returned a verdict against appellant and in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Thornton v. WeaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Powell v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API