Legal Opinion

Blanke v. Hammel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 5, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, Sophie Blanke, filed her suit against the' defendants, L. F. Hammel and Idaline R. Hammel, in the municipal court of Chicago. The action was based on a note dated December 24, 1918, signed by the defendants and made payable to the order of the Sheboygan Loan and Trust Company. The note was not indorsed by the payee. The statement of claim filed on behalf of plaintiff contained the following allegation: “Plaintiff further alleges that said note was negotiated and assigned to her by the Sheboygan Loan and Trust Company-…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walters v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Desnoyers Shoe Co. v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gallagher v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Madison & Kedzie State Bank v. Old Reliable Motor Truck Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiland v. WeilandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Ray v. MollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Christensen v. BlinstrupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API