Hicks v. Daymude

SACK, Judge.

Appellant was the plaintifff in the court below, in an automobile accident case. The jury returned a verdict for the appellee-defendant.

As a result of the accident, the plaintiff claimed, among other elements, an injury to her back. Upon cross-examination she admitted to two prior automobile accidents, but denied an injury to her back in an alleged fall in a Sears-Roebuck store. She was then asked about a fall in an A & P store, which she admitted, whereupon counsel for the defendant confronted her with her answers to questions in a deposition taken in the A & P suit, in which she…