Legal Opinion

Howell v. Randall

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by the plaintiff, a creditor of Cynthia M. Randall, to enforce his debt against real estate alleged to belong to her, although held by her devisee, the defendant Ida May Randall.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

The plaintiff is a creditor of the estate of Cynthia M. Randall, having had a claim against her, at the time of her death, of twenty-nine dollars and thirty-eight cents.

*36Cynthia M. Randall, deceased, was the mother of Sands H. Randall, deceased. Ida May Randall, one of the defendants, is the daughter of Sands H. Randall. Sands H. Randall died, leaving a last will and testament under and by which he devised to his mother certain real estate. The will of Sands H. was admitted to probate, by the surrogate of Madison county, on the 18th day of February, 1888, and was recorded as a will of real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Asche v. . AscheNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Smith v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dill v. . WisnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Rogers v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Betts v. BettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mersereau v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API