Legal Opinion
Cahill v. County of Nassau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution and defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated March 4, 2004, as granted the motion of the defendants County of Nassau, the Nassau County District Attorney, and the Nassau County Office of Consumer Affairs for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and granted those branches of the separate motion of the defendant Robert LoRusso which were for summary judgment dismissing all causes of action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- MacFawn v. KreslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Du Chateau v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Wyllie v. District AttorneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mesiti v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silverman v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Boehner v. HeiseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Semmig v. CharlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Maun v. Edgemont at Tarrytown CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Avgush v. Town of YorktownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006